I have selected four examples of these sorts of events from today. There were many more, of course, but here are four:

1. Pia goes to hospital, thankfully returning this evening. Still in pain, but better.
2. The caterers realise they’ve double-booked, and somehow manage to re-book us with their competitor on the day before our (thus far 70 person) event.
3. Standards Australia announce their OOXML decision, prompting discussion, phone calls from journalists, etc.
4. The batteries in my keyboard and mouse die at exactly the same time. During the Microsoft Technology Summit last year, like Luis, I bought one of the only things worth buying at the Redmond campus employee shop: A Microsoft keyboard (and mouse).

Today, we push pixels. Tomorrow, we move mountains!

It’s disappointing that while our Prime Minister travels the world with a stated intention to increase Australia’s influence and activism on the global stage, we at home have failed so miserably to come to a conclusion — positive or negative — about OOXML.

As a participant on the working group advising Standards Australia, it is surprising that I only know about this due to a report in the trade press. It is also concerning that (again) the news has been revealed so close to the wire that it is unlikely that any feedback could be provided to Standards Australia, or any action taken.

I am not so much surprised at the outcome as disappointed by the process.

Standards Australia has maintained its “abstain” vote on Microsoft’s attempt to attain international standard status for its Office Open XML file format.

[…]

“Unfortunately two clear groups have formed, in part along commercial lines, either supporting or opposing the adoption of OOXML as an International Standard, and despite the more than 1,000 technical issues addressed at the BRM and months of debate, neither side has moved,” he said.

According to Navaratnam this predicament left the standards organisation with no other choice than to maintain its abstain position.

What Navaratnam doesn’t say is that those industry lines were very clear throughout the process: Microsoft vs. a surprisingly broad representation of “everyone else” (including Open Source, proprietary, large multinational, Australian Government and small/medium participants).

Thus, I do not believe that the broader industry perspective on this matter is adequately expressed by the Australian “abstain” position.

Update: Standards Australia have published a media release about the decision, which includes some additional details not mentioned in the story linked above. If anything, it raises further questions about why their concerns did not warrant a “no” vote!

Of course, when Hilf says “commercial”, he really means “proprietary”, or he’d be supporting the awesome commercial efforts of so many FLOSS companies around the world, who not only provide great support (as a fundamentally necessary part of their business model!) and a throat to choke, but give you the freedom to find support elsewhere.

From what I’m seeing in the market, every month there are fewer and fewer ICT decision makers who are being hoodwinked by lies like these — and this time, as a direct quote from Bill Hilf, who is now Microsoft’s general manager of Windows Server marketing and platform strategy.

Thanks again, Novell!