<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia fails to take a position on OOXML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/</link>
	<description>where we&#039;re going, we don&#039;t need roads...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:55:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Holloway</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Holloway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-3017</guid>
		<description>Expecting the two sides to agree was naive of Standards Australia. When it was so clearly those who benefit from the Microsoft Office monopoly Vs. those want to escape the monopoly then of course there will be two sides.

It made their job harder, but they should have formed an opinion themselves rather than blaming the participants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expecting the two sides to agree was naive of Standards Australia. When it was so clearly those who benefit from the Microsoft Office monopoly Vs. those want to escape the monopoly then of course there will be two sides.</p>
<p>It made their job harder, but they should have formed an opinion themselves rather than blaming the participants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Grant</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-3012</link>
		<dc:creator>William Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-3012</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not surprising, but still most disappointing. The three bullets in the press release sound like they&#039;re leading towards disapproval... but that would make sense. If the fast-tracking wasn&#039;t appropriate, why not vote against the fast-tracking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not surprising, but still most disappointing. The three bullets in the press release sound like they&#8217;re leading towards disapproval&#8230; but that would make sense. If the fast-tracking wasn&#8217;t appropriate, why not vote against the fast-tracking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glynn Foster</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Glynn Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 08:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>Don &#039;t worry...the real Australia^W^W^W^W^W New Zealand voted no - http://www.standards.co.nz/news/Media+releases/NZ+maintains+negative+vote+on+OOXML+Standard.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don &#8216;t worry&#8230;the real Australia^W^W^W^W^W New Zealand voted no &#8211; <a href="http://www.standards.co.nz/news/Media+releases/NZ+maintains+negative+vote+on+OOXML+Standard.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.standards.co.nz/news/Media+releases/NZ+maintains+negative+vote+on+OOXML+Standard.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shermozle</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-3001</link>
		<dc:creator>Shermozle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-3001</guid>
		<description>Not all that surprising given Standards Australia is a commercial entity, unlike what most people expect.

It&#039;s pretty amusing that the press releases on their web site are in... PDF format.  Though that recently became a ratified ISO standard.

And, of course, their web site&#039;s HTML fails validation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all that surprising given Standards Australia is a commercial entity, unlike what most people expect.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty amusing that the press releases on their web site are in&#8230; PDF format.  Though that recently became a ratified ISO standard.</p>
<p>And, of course, their web site&#8217;s HTML fails validation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Henstridge</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-2999</link>
		<dc:creator>James Henstridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-2999</guid>
		<description>Does Standards Australia actually do anything useful these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Standards Australia actually do anything useful these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Carden</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-2998</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Carden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/03/31/australia-fails-to-take-a-position-on-ooxml/#comment-2998</guid>
		<description>I thought I saw it coming but hearing it still doesn&#039;t make it palatable. Bugger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I saw it coming but hearing it still doesn&#8217;t make it palatable. Bugger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

