Comments on: GNOME bugs through the ages http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/ where we're going, we don't need roads... Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:58:05 +1100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: tuXXX http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2769 tuXXX Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:40:30 +0000 http://perkypants.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2769 Maybe the next ubuntu/fedora release(s) will increase those numbers too. Maybe the next ubuntu/fedora release(s) will increase those numbers too.

]]> By: andre klapper http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2742 andre klapper Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:55:59 +0000 http://perkypants.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2742 yepp, bug-buddy switched to xml-rpc. to me, the riot started in late 2006 when ubuntu 6.10 and fedora 5 were released at the same time (http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2006/11/29/bug-flood/). after that, things have never been the same again as before... yepp, bug-buddy switched to xml-rpc.

to me, the riot started in late 2006 when ubuntu 6.10 and fedora 5 were released at the same time (http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/2006/11/29/bug-flood/). after that, things have never been the same again as before…

]]> By: Filip http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2741 Filip Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:50:55 +0000 http://perkypants.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2741 Karl, you're looking at the wrong data. Jeff is referring to the debian bug counts. See the second link. Karl, you’re looking at the wrong data. Jeff is referring to the debian bug counts. See the second link.

]]> By: Paul Betts http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2739 Paul Betts Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:15:16 +0000 http://perkypants.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2739 Isn't 2007 when Bug Buddy started making automated reports into Bugzilla? There's your spike. Isn’t 2007 when Bug Buddy started making automated reports into Bugzilla? There’s your spike.

]]> By: Adam Williamson http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2738 Adam Williamson Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:14:12 +0000 http://perkypants.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2738 As Xav says, it's bug-buddy automatically reporting crashes. Creates a huge number of new reports, especially as duplicates aren't automatically detected (your poor triage team has to do it). Karl, he was talking about the Debian figures he *linked* to at that point, not the GNOME figures he *printed*. As Xav says, it’s bug-buddy automatically reporting crashes. Creates a huge number of new reports, especially as duplicates aren’t automatically detected (your poor triage team has to do it).

Karl, he was talking about the Debian figures he *linked* to at that point, not the GNOME figures he *printed*.

]]> By: Karl Lattimer http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2736 Karl Lattimer Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:59:35 +0000 http://perkypants.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2736 Surely you mean the spike in 2006! 2004 … 39927 2003 … 36432 Not really a spike but; 2006 … 66011 2005 … 37838 Is close to double Surely you mean the spike in 2006!

2004 … 39927
2003 … 36432

Not really a spike but;

2006 … 66011
2005 … 37838

Is close to double

]]> By: Xav http://bethesignal.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2734 Xav Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:28:04 +0000 http://perkypants.org/blog/2008/01/09/gnome-bugs-through-the-ages/#comment-2734 I think the spikes are due to changes in bug-buddy. I think the spikes are due to changes in bug-buddy.

]]>