<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Requiem for Linux Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/</link>
	<description>where we&#039;re going, we don&#039;t need roads...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:58:05 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: TH</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>TH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>LJ was great under Don Marti. Now, its Petreley on every page. [Can&#039;t resist interjecting. -Ed.] Where did all the interesting articles go?  I don&#039;t like the tone anymore either.  It seems like all the effort is going into graphic design these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LJ was great under Don Marti. Now, its Petreley on every page. [Can&#8217;t resist interjecting. -Ed.] Where did all the interesting articles go?  I don&#8217;t like the tone anymore either.  It seems like all the effort is going into graphic design these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Dowland</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Dowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 17:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve written my own letter to the editor and published it online: http://alcopop.org/log/2006/04/01/#lj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written my own letter to the editor and published it online: <a href="http://alcopop.org/log/2006/04/01/#lj" rel="nofollow">http://alcopop.org/log/2006/04/01/#lj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdub</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>jdub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-60&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Segendium&lt;/a&gt;: I think the FLOSS community has overwhelmingly proven that it does innovate, it does take different approaches and it is not always just a bad clone of something else. Much to Petreley&#039;s chagrin, GNOME is a brilliant example of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-60" rel="nofollow">Segendium</a>: I think the FLOSS community has overwhelmingly proven that it does innovate, it does take different approaches and it is not always just a bad clone of something else. Much to Petreley&#8217;s chagrin, GNOME is a brilliant example of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Segedunum</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Segedunum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>As much as I think Nicholas just goes a bit too far without explaining himself properly, he brings up a legitimate point. Is an open source community going to do something different, or is it always designed to copy i.e. Mono?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I think Nicholas just goes a bit too far without explaining himself properly, he brings up a legitimate point. Is an open source community going to do something different, or is it always designed to copy i.e. Mono?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Balaam</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Balaam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Just sent this email to Linux Journal:

http://www.artificialworlds.net/blog/#Letter_to_Linux_Journal_20060317090630

_Really_ gutted about my favourite magazine becoming Slashdot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just sent this email to Linux Journal:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.artificialworlds.net/blog/#Letter_to_Linux_Journal_20060317090630" rel="nofollow">http://www.artificialworlds.net/blog/#Letter_to_Linux_Journal_20060317090630</a></p>
<p>_Really_ gutted about my favourite magazine becoming Slashdot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Dishkuvek</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Dishkuvek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 05:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I just got back from the bookstore where I was contemplating buying the new Linux Journal.  Then I read the back page where that slob of an editor rants and raves, he makes himself sound like a real bastard.  Needless to say, I did not buy the magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got back from the bookstore where I was contemplating buying the new Linux Journal.  Then I read the back page where that slob of an editor rants and raves, he makes himself sound like a real bastard.  Needless to say, I did not buy the magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David L Norris</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>David L Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I feel the same way.  The /etc/rant article about GNOME sickens me.  It sickens me that he&#039;d waste my money publishing such a negative article about anything. Linux Journal is no longer a happy place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I feel the same way.  The /etc/rant article about GNOME sickens me.  It sickens me that he&#8217;d waste my money publishing such a negative article about anything. Linux Journal is no longer a happy place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Dowland</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Dowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I finally got my LJ subscription sorted this year, after years of buying odd issues. I subbed in oct &#039;05 but there was an error so it was delayed until this year... and started with Petreleyâ€™s first issue as editor.

I have found the tone of the last two (or three?) issues worrying. Apart from /etc/rant, the choice of reader&#039;s letters I have found poor (case in point. Someone writes &quot;ubuntu is great. For me, ubuntu IS linux&quot;. What&#039;s the point in a letter like that?)

It seems that the general content is moving more towards end-user and away from what made LJ stand out in the first place. The last issue had a 6 PAGE ARTICLE on installing mediawiki!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got my LJ subscription sorted this year, after years of buying odd issues. I subbed in oct &#8216;05 but there was an error so it was delayed until this year&#8230; and started with Petreleyâ€™s first issue as editor.</p>
<p>I have found the tone of the last two (or three?) issues worrying. Apart from /etc/rant, the choice of reader&#8217;s letters I have found poor (case in point. Someone writes &#8220;ubuntu is great. For me, ubuntu IS linux&#8221;. What&#8217;s the point in a letter like that?)</p>
<p>It seems that the general content is moving more towards end-user and away from what made LJ stand out in the first place. The last issue had a 6 PAGE ARTICLE on installing mediawiki!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain Delon</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Delon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>There are alternatives. Go for Linux Magazine or one of the other mags. Vive la difference!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are alternatives. Go for Linux Magazine or one of the other mags. Vive la difference!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Susanka</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>James Susanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/15/requiem-for-linux-journal/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you - I have over a year left of subscription and after that who knows

It was a class act magazine and it looks like it is going to lose that reputation. 

If I wanted gutter rants I would go browse slashdot all day.  But I wanted my magazine to be uplifting and positive and have some cool technical stuff.  

But now I think we will see at the grocery check out line soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you - I have over a year left of subscription and after that who knows</p>
<p>It was a class act magazine and it looks like it is going to lose that reputation. </p>
<p>If I wanted gutter rants I would go browse slashdot all day.  But I wanted my magazine to be uplifting and positive and have some cool technical stuff.  </p>
<p>But now I think we will see at the grocery check out line soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
