<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fighting on New Ground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/06/fighting-on-new-ground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/06/fighting-on-new-ground/</link>
	<description>where we're going, we don't need roads...</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems Â» because technology is just another ecosystem</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/06/fighting-on-new-ground/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems Â» because technology is just another ecosystem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/06/fighting-on-new-ground/#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;(will be up soon and I'll point to it) there are those who'd contend that trying to match Microsoft feature by feature, as Open Office sometimes does, is more or less a losing proposition. Another Friend of RedMonk, Ubuntu's Jeff Waugh, for example,said the following in making the case for GNOME Office:OpenOffice.org is not aggressively competitive with Microsoft Office - itÂ’s playing to match the feature matrix instead of leapfrogging and defining new ground to fight on. That is not a winning&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->(will be up soon and I&#8217;ll point to it) there are those who&#8217;d contend that trying to match Microsoft feature by feature, as Open Office sometimes does, is more or less a losing proposition. Another Friend of RedMonk, Ubuntu&#8217;s Jeff Waugh, for example,said the following in making the case for GNOME Office:OpenOffice.org is not aggressively competitive with Microsoft Office - itÂ’s playing to match the feature matrix instead of leapfrogging and defining new ground to fight on. That is not a winning<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
