<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fighting on New Ground</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/06/fighting-on-new-ground/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/06/fighting-on-new-ground/</link>
	<description>where we're going, we don't need roads...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:17:17 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1-beta2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: tecosystems Â» because technology is just another ecosystem</title>
		<link>http://bethesignal.org/blog/2006/03/06/fighting-on-new-ground/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>tecosystems Â» because technology is just another ecosystem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perkypants.org/blog/2006/03/06/fighting-on-new-ground/#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;(will be up soon and I&#039;ll point to it) there are those who&#039;d contend that trying to match Microsoft feature by feature, as Open Office sometimes does, is more or less a losing proposition. Another Friend of RedMonk, Ubuntu&#039;s Jeff Waugh, for example,said the following in making the case for GNOME Office:OpenOffice.org is not aggressively competitive with Microsoft Office - itÂ’s playing to match the feature matrix instead of leapfrogging and defining new ground to fight on. That is not a winning&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->(will be up soon and I&#8217;ll point to it) there are those who&#8217;d contend that trying to match Microsoft feature by feature, as Open Office sometimes does, is more or less a losing proposition. Another Friend of RedMonk, Ubuntu&#8217;s Jeff Waugh, for example,said the following in making the case for GNOME Office:OpenOffice.org is not aggressively competitive with Microsoft Office &#8211; itÂ’s playing to match the feature matrix instead of leapfrogging and defining new ground to fight on. That is not a winning<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
